cleveland854321: WITH REGARDS TO USING ROAD RAGE AS A TOOL FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT

Let's assume that there was a drunk driver somewhere between the cities of Columbus, Ohio and Cleveland, Ohio. The Chinese born Drunk Driver killed people in his drunk driving rampage. The Chinese Drunk Driver got arrested and put on trial. Despite being both unemployed and unemployable, the Chinese Drunk Driver was able to afford a fantastic lawyer and escaped justice without a scratch. Meanwhile, as many as twenty Caucasian people died in the drunk driving incident that remains unavenged. Now this is a question that I'll pose to the reader of this internet blog. What would you do?
1. Would you say that the Legal System had their chance and blew it so now it's time for a wrongful death lawsuit? That would be the best option available.
2. Would you punish drunk driving road rage with drunk driving road rage. In such a case, you would drink an entire six pack of beer, slam into the Chinese Drunk Driver and kill him in a messy car wreck fiasco. The police won't arrest you for punishing drunk driving road rage by using drunk driving road rage as a punishment tool. After all, you're only crime was in taking out the trash. Who knows? You might get a film deal making you out to be a hero. That would be the worst solution to the crime. Two wrongs never makes anything right. Drunk Driving Road Rage doesn't become instantly heroic simply because it's being done by a Caucasian person as opposed to being done by a Chinese person.
The moral of the story is simple. Don't drink and drive. Don't drive and road rage. Always be both sober and calm when you're driving a car. Driving a car isn't a right. Driving a car is a privilege. The privilege of driving a car should be taken away if it can't be used properly and with maturity.